Program Planning Resources
Academic Program Proposals require:
- Student Interest data (liberal arts and technical/professional programs)
- Labor Market Analysis (technical/professional programs)
Undergraduate Certificate Definition
"An undergraduate certificate may have an occupational outcome or address a focused area of study." [Chancellor’s Procedures, Academic Programs, Procedure 3.36.1 Adopted August 2007]
The design of a certificate must be coherent, with explicit outcomes identified. The criteria below have been developed to clarify and interpret the purposes of a certificate.
A certificate program is designed to:
;• Prepare individuals for employment, licensure or certification in an occupation (e.g., Carpentry Assistant, Wound Care Nurse, Microsoft Network Communication)
• Provide specialized, in-depth or advanced knowledge or skills in a focused area of study such as a discipline, field of study, profession, or occupation (e.g., American Indian Studies, American Sign Language, Advanced Collision Services, Supervisory Leadership)
I. A certificate program may not be primarily designed to:
- Explore careers
- Introduce a discipline, field of study, occupation or industry,
- Meet general education requirements,
- Qualify graduates for entry into another program,
- Prepare individuals for entry into a baccalaureate or post-baccalaureate professional program, or
- Allow students to qualify for financial aid.
II. A certificate may include restricted electives,e.g., a choice between two or three courses related to the certificates outcomes. A certificate may not include general electives.
III. An individualized studies certificate is not permitted.
IV. If the title of a certificate includes such words as basic, careers, concepts, core, foundations, fundamentals, general, introduction, individualized, orientation, or pre-XXX, it will be reviewed by the office of the chancellor to determine if either the proposed certificate is appropriate or another program name would be more appropriate. A certificate title may include the word advanced, but it is not recommended.
Admission requirements may include an expectation of previous knowledge or skill, a previous award, work experience or its equivalent. Requirements for entrance into certificates must be outlined in catalog copy to ensure the likelihood of student success. Example: Individuals working in the computer field might need to upgrade programming skills or explore new areas of knowledge such as computer security. The expectation can be that these individuals will have extensive prior experience, equivalent knowledge and/or have completed a previous award to successfully complete the certificate.
Definition: a 9 to 16-credit undergraduate certificate
The Expedited Undergraduate Certificate application form requires that evidence be presented documenting a near-term training need defined as having to offer the program within the current or next semester. It responds to a need requested by employer(s), workforce centers, or other entities and does not require other labor market information or evidence of student interest.
Expedited Approval for Certificate Programs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Unnecessary Duplication Situation | Notice of Intent | Approval Conditions | Request to Extend |
A | Another college/university offers a similar program in the geographic service area | 5 days | Program can be offered for one or more cohorts within a 12-month period from start of the first cohort. | Submit a new program application |
B | There are no similar programs in the geographic area | Not required | No conditions | Not applicable |
Minnesota State Models
Models Used Outside of Minnesota
- Appalachian State University
- Boise State University
- Gallaudet University
- Idaho State University
- Indiana State University
- Lewis-Clark College
- North Carolina State University
- University of Alaska
- University of Idaho
- Washington State University
- Western Carolina University
Research and Publications on Strategic Prioritization
- Hanover Research Best Practices in Academic Program Review 2012
- The Pressure to Prioritize, By Doug Lederman from Inside Higher Ed, November 11, 2010
- Higher Education Tackles Program Prioritization: Practitioners Raise Questions, Provide Answers, By Robert C. Dickeson (2010) for Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (STLHE)
- Lessons Learned from Institutions Undertaking Program Prioritization, By Daniel Fusch from Academic Impressions, May 31, 2013.
- Doing the PPP: A skeptical perspective, by Leo Groarke and Beverly Hamilton from Academic Matters, January 13, 2014.
- Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services: Reallocating Resources to Achieve Strategic Balance, By Robert C. Dickeson (2010)