February 2026

Skip to main content
Minnesota State header logo

Procurement Pulse

Volume 2, Issue 1 | From the Office of Procurement and Contract Management
Publication Date: February 13, 2026


From the Office of Procurement and Contract Management

Tim Anderson - System Director, Procurement and Contract Management

Strengthening Accessibility Through Strategic Contracting

Minnesota State has executed a new systemwide master contract with Netcentric Technologies for its CommonLook software solution. This contract supports our institutions in meeting digital accessibility requirements for PDF documents and reinforces our collective commitment to equitable access to information.

  • Master Contract #: MNSCU-2026-058892
  • Effective: February 4, 2026
  • Expires: February 1, 2027

CommonLook is designed to assist institutions in creating and remediating PDF documents to meet accessibility standards, including WCAG and Section 508 requirements. As digital content continues to expand across instructional, administrative, and public-facing environments, accessibility compliance must remain a priority.

Accessible documents are not optional, they are both a legal obligation and a student equity imperative. This master contract provides campuses with a competitively sourced, compliant solution to support those responsibilities.

How to Purchase Under the Master Contract

Follow established procurement workflow

Detailed purchasing instructions are available within the Contract Attachments section of JAGGAER under Master Contract MNSCU-2026-058892.

  1. Create a JAGGAER contract record tied to the master contract.
  2. Review and follow the purchasing instructions in the contract attachments.
  3. Submit a requisition to encumber funds.
  4. Issue a purchase order in accordance with campus procedures.

Information regarding license acquisition and pricing has already been distributed to each campus.

Information Beat

Spotlight on indirect spend, hidden costs, and how procurement data informs better decisions.

Procurement and Contract Management

Process Before Purchase: Why Structure Drives Better Outcomes

Strengthening procurement discipline across Minnesota State

In public procurement, the strength of the outcome is directly tied to the strength of the process. When purchasing activity moves quickly without clear approvals, defined roles, or documented rationale, institutions may still complete the transaction, but often at higher cost, greater risk, and reduced long-term flexibility.

Across Minnesota State, procurement events vary in size and complexity. Some are straightforward and routine. Others, particularly technology, professional services, and multi-year contracts, carry broader operational implications. In these cases, disciplined review and documentation are not administrative burdens; they are safeguards.

Key Elements of a Strong Procurement Process

  • Clear identification of business need and scope.
  • Defined approval pathways prior to release.
  • Early coordination with IT, Legal, and Risk when applicable.
  • Documented justification for renewals or sole-source requests.
  • Alignment with existing master or cooperative contracts.

Removing or compressing review steps may appear to accelerate timelines. In practice, it often shifts risk downstream, resulting in contract amendments, audit findings, or costly integration challenges.

A deliberate process protects institutional resources, strengthens transparency, and positions procurement as a strategic partner rather than a transactional checkpoint.

Technology Contracts: Governance Before Implementation

Reducing duplication and long-term integration risk

A recurring pattern

  • Software selected before integration review.
  • Renewals executed without capability reassessment.
  • Parallel systems solving the same functional problem.
  • Contract terms that outlive system strategy.

Technology contracts carry long-term operational consequences. Unlike commodity purchases, software and service platforms influence data structure, workflow design, reporting capability, and integration with Workday and other enterprise systems.

Early coordination between procurement, IT, legal, and project leadership reduces duplication and ensures that system-level strategy guides local decision-making. Asking simple governance questions upfront can prevent costly remediation later:

  • Does an existing master or cooperative contract already meet this need?
  • Is Workday or another enterprise system capable of delivering this functionality?
  • Are renewal terms aligned with long-term modernization plans?

Strong governance does not slow innovation, it ensures that innovation integrates, scales, and sustains.


Inside Workday Procurement

Procurement and Contract Management


Sourcing Sync

Celena Monn

Why Avoiding Sourcing Events Costs More Than It Saves

Understanding the financial, operational, and compliance impacts of bypassing structured procurement.

Across Minnesota State, campuses sometimes hesitate to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Bid (RFB) or adopt a new system. The reasons are understandable: concern about timelines, complexity, unclear requirements, or prior negative experiences. In an effort to avoid perceived risk, departments may attempt to extend existing contracts, rely on informal quotes, or proceed without structured procurement support.

While this approach may feel safer in the short term, avoiding a formal sourcing process often creates larger challenges: financially, operationally, and from a compliance standpoint.

Limited Competition and Higher Costs

Without competition, vendors have little incentive to provide their most competitive pricing or strongest contractual terms. Over time, this results in higher total cost of ownership and missed opportunities for innovation.

Misaligned Solutions

Quick decisions made outside a structured process can lead to systems or services that do not fully meet institutional needs. What appears efficient initially can become a long-term constraint if scalability, integration, or support capabilities are insufficient.

Compliance and Audit Exposure

Public-sector procurement policies exist to protect the institution. Skipping sourcing steps increases audit risk, weakens documentation defensibility, and can create reputational harm if decisions are challenged.

Additional Risk Drivers

  • Reactive purchasing: Last-minute renewals reduce leverage and limit vendor options.
  • Staff burnout: Managing complex procurements without support increases stress and error risk.
  • Vendor-defined requirements: Overreliance on supplier guidance can shift control away from the institution.
  • Fragmented purchasing: Departments operating independently weaken systemwide buying power.

Sourcing Assistance Is a Strategic Advantage

Procurement teams are not barriers to progress. They are partners in risk mitigation, market analysis, RFP development, vendor evaluation, and contract negotiation. Engaging procurement early allows departments to:

  • Clarify requirements before they become constraints.
  • Understand pricing benchmarks and market options.
  • Build realistic timelines and expectations.
  • Share the workload of complex sourcing efforts.

Consider Master and Cooperative Contracts

In many cases, campuses may not need to conduct their own sourcing event. Minnesota State master contracts and cooperative contracts have already been competitively solicited and vetted.

  • Bypass the full solicitation process while remaining compliant.
  • Save significant time compared to issuing a new RFP.
  • Leverage pre-negotiated pricing and contract terms.
  • Reduce administrative burden for departments and procurement teams.

Campuses must still complete remaining procurement requirements, but these vehicles provide a compliant and efficient alternative.

Sourcing Radar

Open sourcing activity and newly awarded master contracts.

Procurement and Contract Management

Newly Awarded Master Contracts

Recently executed agreements available for campus use

IT Forensic Services

Purpose: Expand capacity to support digital investigations and forensic analysis across the system.

  • OculusIT – Contract No. MNSCU-2026-058988
  • Digital Forensic Services – Contract No. MNSCU-2026-058987
  • Term: 3 years

3rd Party Collection Services

Purpose: Third-party collection services for past due student loans and receivables.

  • ConServceMNSCU-2025-053583
  • Williams & FudgeMNSCU-2025-053904
  • Term: 5 years

Enterprise Online Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Management

Purpose: Supports OSHA compliance and strengthens safety through an online SDS system.

  • Vendor: MSDSONLINE – MNSCU-2026-059317
  • Term: 3 years
  • Project Sponsor: John Dignmann

Feasibility Study for Major Gift Fundraising Potential

Purpose: Market assessment and feasibility study.

  • Vendor: The Phoenix Philanthropy Group – MNSCU-2026-060180
  • Term: 1 year
  • Project Sponsor: Jen Dobossy

Sourcing Events in Progress

Active solicitations and evaluation activity

Currently Open / Out for Bid

  • Enterprise Library System – Under Evaluation February 2, 2026

Under Evaluation

  • Enterprise Content Management System – Under evaluation

Supplier Diversity

Celena Monn

Black-Owned Businesses That Changed How America Buys

Innovation born from exclusion helped redefine modern procurement practices.

Long before “procurement strategy” and “supplier diversity” became common terminology, Black entrepreneurs were building sophisticated supply chains out of necessity. Excluded from traditional purchasing networks, financing systems, and distribution channels, they developed alternative models that reshaped how goods and services move across the United States.

Madam C.J. Walker

Often recognized as the first self-made female millionaire in the United States, Madam C.J. Walker built a fully vertically integrated enterprise in the early 1900s. Facing barriers in traditional manufacturing and distribution, she controlled production, packaging, distribution, and sales through a national network of more than 20,000 agents.

Her direct-to-consumer model mirrors decentralized sales and distribution strategies used in modern procurement environments today. What began as a response to exclusion became a scalable supply chain model studied decades later. Listen to Madam C.M. Walker’s story

Reginald Lewis

In 1987, Reginald Lewis led one of the largest leveraged buyouts of the decade, acquiring Beatrice Foods’ international operations. This placed a Black-owned company at the center of a global procurement and manufacturing network, challenging assumptions about scale, supplier capability, and executive leadership in corporate sourcing. Watch Reginald Lewis’ story

Jesse Russell

Telecommunications pioneer Jesse Russell helped lay the foundation for modern digital cellular networks. Holding more than 80 patents, his innovations enabled the wireless infrastructure that powers real-time procurement, logistics tracking, mobile ordering, and global supplier connectivity. Wireless Communication Base Station

Technologies derived from his work are embedded in the mobile devices and wireless systems procurement professionals rely on every day.

Why This Matters to Procurement

These leaders did not innovate because it was fashionable. They innovated because traditional procurement systems excluded them.

  • Vertical integration to control cost and quality.
  • Alternative supplier and distribution networks.
  • Scalable models built for sustainability and growth.
  • Market expansion through inclusive economic participation.

Supplier diversity is not about adding risk. It is about recognizing proven innovation that has been shaping procurement and supply chain strategy for more than a century.


e-Procurement Administration

Procurement and Contract Management

Adjusting Notification Preferences in JAGGAER

Whether you are a power user or only log into JAGGAER occasionally, reviewing your notification settings can significantly reduce unnecessary email traffic.

Step 1: Access Your Profile

In the top-right corner of JAGGAER, select your user profile. Within your profile settings, expand Notification Preferences on the left-hand side. From there, select the notification category you wish to review (for example, Contract Notifications). MODAL1

Important Caution

Selecting “None” will stop all notifications for that event type. Currently, JAGGAER does not allow notifications to be filtered by campus. Turning notifications off entirely may prevent important updates from reaching you.

Recommended Best Practice

Instead of choosing “Email & Notification,” consider switching to “Notification” only. This keeps alerts visible within JAGGAER (via the notification bell in the top-right corner) for the most recent 30 days, while reducing inbox volume. MODAL2

Using Outlook Rules for Targeted Filtering

One of the most effective ways to manage JAGGAER emails is through Microsoft Outlook rules.

How to Create a Rule MODAL3

  1. Go to Outlook Settings (gear icon).
  2. Select Mail → Rules.
  3. Create a new rule based on sender and content criteria.

If you are receiving notifications related to other institutions’ contracts, consider the following configuration:

  • Condition: Sender is SciQuest Support or support@sciquest.com.
  • Action: Move messages to a designated JAGGAER folder.
  • Exception: Do not move the message if your institution code appears in the subject or body.

If you need assistance configuring notification preferences or setting up Outlook rules, please submit a ticket through the Procurement Service Desk.


Analytics in Action

Joan Anderl - Business Analyst

Why Analytics Matter in Procurement

Business analytics in procurement is not just about numbers, it is about insight. By analyzing purchasing patterns, contract utilization, and vendor performance, campuses can transform data into actionable intelligence that drives smarter decisions and stronger outcomes.

What analytics enable

  • Better sourcing: Identify high-performing vendors and underutilized contracts.
  • Budget accuracy: Use historical trends for planning and forecasting.
  • Negotiation leverage: Bring data to supplier conversations.
  • Equity & sustainability: Track diverse and environmentally responsible suppliers.

Where to start (top spend)

  1. Open Workday.
  2. Go to Organization → Dashboards → Procurement.
  3. Review widgets for Top Suppliers, Spend by Category, and Trends.

Use this view to spot consolidation opportunities, quick wins, and categories to target for strategic sourcing.

Apply insights in Workday (Purchasing)

  • Validate drivers: Drill into suppliers, spend categories, and business units.
  • Find quick wins: Look for duplicate suppliers and fragmented category spend.
  • Set targets: Define savings/standardization goals by category or unit.
  • Monitor progress: Revisit the dashboard monthly to track movement.

Go deeper in JAGGAER (Contracts & Sourcing)

  • Contracts: Check utilization and upcoming expirations tied to high-spend areas.
  • Sourcing: Align events to top-spend categories; invite high-performers and new diverse suppliers.
  • Supplier performance: Review cycle times, participation, and award patterns.
  • Pipeline: Build an event roadmap from the categories flagged in Workday.

Procurement Planner

Minnesota State Professional Development

Mark your calendar and register today.

Procure-to-Pay Q&A Forum

  • March 12 at 1:30 PM

These open forums provide real-time support for procurement, contracts, Workday purchasing, and Marketplace questions. Bring your scenarios, compliance questions, and process clarifications.

These sessions are designed to strengthen system alignment, reduce uncertainty, and provide practical guidance for campus procurement professionals.

External Professional Development

Center for Procurement Excellence – “The RFP Doctor”

  • February 19: Your RFP Needs a Check-up – The Known Unknowns
  • March 19: A Primer on Alternative Delivery

Additional Learning Opportunities

  • NAEP Event List
  • NGIP Webinars
  • MNNIGP Webinars

Ongoing professional development strengthens compliance knowledge, sourcing effectiveness, and strategic procurement capability across Minnesota State. Investing time in learning directly supports stronger outcomes for our campuses and the communities we serve.


Stay Connected

Questions or Ideas? Email us at procurement@minnstate.edu .

Resource Hub: Access policies, templates, and training materials on our Procurement Community Site (internal employee access only).

Suggest a Topic: What would you like to see in future editions? Share your feedback at procurement@minnstate.edu .

Thank you for being part of Minnesota State’s procurement community. Together, we are building a more efficient, equitable, and resilient supply chain that reflects the diversity of our students and communities. Stay tuned for our next edition on January 08, 2026!