Dakota County Application and Report
Consortium Performance Report
Perkins V Consortium: Dakota County
February 28, 2025
Report overview
The following report displays your consortium’s:
- current established performance levels (targets) for the eight Perkins V grant years (Table 1 & Table 2, column SDPL),
- actual performance on the seven secondary core indicators and three postsecondary core indicators (Table 1 & Table 2, column Actual Perf %),
- counts of secondary and postsecondary participants and concentrators (Table 3).
Table 1 and Table 2 provide a summary of your established targets for performance on your Perkins V secondary and postsecondary performance indicators, as well as your actual performance on those indicators for each grant year where final data are available, including the baseline year.
This report provides an official indication of whether your consortium is required to complete an Improvement Plan for any of the core indicators for each grant year. This is indicated by an orange (down triangle) before the Actual Perf% value. Consortia are required to submit an improvement plan for any core indicator where actual performance is less than 90% of the established performance level for that indicator. After three consecutive years on an improvement plan for a specific indicator (beginning with Grant Year 2 (2022) due to the Covid-19 peacetime emergency), consortia require additional technical assistance, indicated by a red (technical assistance symbol) before the Actual Perf% value in the third year.
State determined performance levels (SDPLs) for Grant Years 5 through 8 are set annually based on “the average actual performance of the 2 most recently completed program years.” SDPLs for Grant Year 5 are final. Please review the “State Determined Performance Level (SDPL) Report,” linked in the Additional Information section, to see proposed SDPLs for Grant Years 6 through 8. This document is updated annually to reflect actual performance rates and finalized SDPLs. Previous updates are noted at the end of the document.
If you have questions about these reports, please contact Karl Ohrn (karl.ohrn@minnstate.edu). If you have questions about your data, please contact Russell Dahlke (postsecondary data) (Russell.Dahlke@minnstate.edu).
This document is formatted for legal-size (8.5” x 14”) paper. Please print accordingly.
How to read the tables
The tables below display the State Determined Performance Level/target (column SDPL), actual performance percentage (Actual Perf %), and notification of whether an Improvement Plan is required ( or before Actual Perf%) for every accountability indicator each grant year.
The year shown in parentheses after the Grant Year indicates the reporting year of the data in alignment with the corresponding federal CAR (Consolidated Annual Report) grant year.
- For secondary indicators, reporting years align with school years (e.g., 2021 reflects school year 2020-21), with the exception of 1S1 and 3S1 which both lag by one year.
- For postsecondary indicators 2P1 and 3P1, reporting years reflect the last year of the three-year cohort reported.
- For postsecondary indicator 1P1, the cohort reporting lags by one year.
Improvement Plan rule: If the performance rate on an indicator falls below 90% of the established SDPL for the indicator/grant reporting year, an improvement plan () is required. After three consecutive years on an improvement plan for a specific indicator, technical assistance () is required.
Table 1 (Secondary)
Table 1 lists secondary indicators by row. Columns are grouped by grant reporting year; each year includes SDPL and Actual Perf % where available. Cells with “—” indicate values not provided in the PDF for that year.
| Indicator Name | Baseline (2020) | Grant Year 1 (2021) | Grant Year 2 (2022) | Grant Year 3 (2023) | Grant Year 4 (2024) | Grant Year 5 (2025) | Grant Year 6 (2026) | Grant Year 7 (2027) | Grant Year 8 (2028) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | |
| 1S1: Graduation Rate (4-year) | 89.13% | 54.36% | 89.58% | 54.41% | 90.89% | 54.51% | 92.63% | 54.72% | 92.24% | 92.90% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2S1: Academic Proficiency: Reading/Language Arts | N/A* | 10.65% | 54.05% | 10.71% | 46.67% | 10.84% | 45.98% | 11.09% | 42.71% | 46.34% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2S2: Academic Proficiency: Mathematics | N/A* | 7.70% | 33.19% | 7.74% | 34.51% | 7.81% | 24.28% | 7.94% | 26.35% | 29.41% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2S3: Academic Proficiency: Science | N/A** | N/A** | N/A** | N/A** | N/A** | N/A** | 39.38% | N/A** | 37.78% | 39.39% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3S1: Post-Program Placement | 58.71% | 43.92% | 56.16% | 43.99% | 48.60% | 44.11% | 51.57% | 44.37% | 59.90% | 51.58% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4S1: Nontraditional Program Concentration | 30.28% | 10.03% | 25.25% | 10.08% | 21.34% | 10.18% | 20.50% | 10.36% | 23.29% | 20.93% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5S3: Program Quality: Work-Based Learning | 13.28% | 3.43% | 5.57% | 3.44% | 5.01% | 3.47% | 5.85% | 3.52% | 11.14% | 6.35% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Notes:
- * Due to the COVID-19 peacetime emergency, MCA testing was canceled; therefore, no Reading or Mathematics academic achievement data are available to report for SY2019-20. Across SY2020-21 secondary districts shifted from remote to in-person learning at different times and lengths of time.
- ** Data for the Academic Proficiency in Science were not available to report until SY2022-2023. Beginning in SY2024, the science assessment was offered to students at the end of their 10th grade year after completion of the Life Science course requirement. SDPLs will be assessed for the 2S3 performance indicator beginning GY5 (SY2025).
Table 2 (Postsecondary)
Table 2 lists postsecondary indicators by row. Columns are grouped by grant reporting year; each year includes SDPL and Actual Perf % where available. Cells with “—” indicate values not provided in the PDF for that year.
| Indicator Name | Baseline (2020) | Grant Year 1 (2021) | Grant Year 2 (2022) | Grant Year 3 (2023) | Grant Year 4 (2024) | Grant Year 5 (2025) | Grant Year 6 (2026) | Grant Year 7 (2027) | Grant Year 8 (2028) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | SDPL | Actual Perf % | |
| 1P1: Postsecondary Retention and Placement | 94.93% | 95.16% | 96.50% | 86.73% | 93.77% | 86.73% | 95.92% | 86.73% | 96.01% | 95.01% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2P1: Earned Recognized Postsecondary Credential | 67.75% | 71.62% | 71.10% | 62.04% | 66.07% | 62.04% | 66.51% | 62.04% | 67.04% | 66.93% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3P1: Nontraditional Program Enrollment | 8.78% | 10.82% | 10.93% | 8.19% | 10.29% | 8.19% | 11.50% | 8.19% | 11.42% | 11.30% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
If the performance rate on an indicator falls below 90% of the established SDPL for the indicator/grant reporting year, an improvement plan () is required. After three consecutive years on an improvement plan for a specific indicator, technical assistance () is required.
Table 3 (Enrollment)
Table 3 lists participant and concentrator counts for secondary and postsecondary by grant reporting year. Blank cells indicate years not provided in the PDF table.
| Enrollment | Baseline (2020) | Grant Year 1 (2021) | Grant Year 2 (2022) | Grant Year 3 (2023) | Grant Year 4 (2024) | Grant Year 5 (2025) | Grant Year 6 (2026) | Grant Year 7 (2027) | Grant Year 8 (2028) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary Participants | 4,628 | 4,730 | 4,811 | 4,498 | 4,698 | — | — | — | — |
| Secondary Concentrators | 2,112 | 2,031 | 1,924 | 1,957 | 2,512 | — | — | — | — |
| Postsecondary Participants | 1,267 | 1,185 | 1,180 | 1,184 | 1,224 | — | — | — | — |
| Postsecondary Concentrators | 927 | 858 | 890 | 866 | 886 | — | — | — | — |
Additional Information
- Perkins V Accountability (Scroll to “Accountability Resources” bar/section)
- Secondary Perkins Definitions and Postsecondary Perkins Definitions
- Secondary Data Site (requires system login/account to use)
- Postsecondary Data Site (Power BI reports require Minnesota State system login/account to use)
- Proposed Year 6 - 8 SDPLs (Select your consortium then open the “State-Determined Performance Level (SDPL) Report”)
Performance Report Updates
- February 2025 – Reporting year 2024 performance data added and report format updated to include Grant Years 5 - 8
- January 2024 – Reporting year 2023 performance data added
- February 2023 – Reporting year 2022 performance data added
- September 2022 – Postsecondary SDPL updates to approved SDPL revisions due to unanticipated circumstances
- February 2022 – Reporting year 2021 performance data added
- July 2021 – Secondary SDPL updates to approved SDPL revisions due to unanticipated circumstances
- March 2021 – Postsecondary correction to 1P1 SDPL
Consortium Performance Report
Perkins V Consortium: Dakota County
Updated: March 24, 2025
Report overview
The following report displays Dakota County’s actual performance for Grant Years 3–4 (2023–2024), average performance across these years for baselining purposes, and proposed State Determined Performance Levels (SDPLs) for Grant Year 6 (2026). GY6 SDPLs will be considered final upon approval of the annual revision to the state plan by the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE). Consortium leaders will be notified upon approval.
How to read the tables
Requirements for state determined levels of performance require that new performance targets/SDPLs must:
- Be expressed as a percentage or numerical form.
- Show continuous meaningful progress toward improving the performance of all CTE students.
- Be higher than the average actual performance of the two most recently completed program years.
Note
- For proposed secondary SDPLs, in cases where the average actual performance of the two most recent years was lower than the actual performance of GY4 (2024), the actual performance level of GY4 (2024) was used to set the GY6 (2026) SDPL.
- For proposed postsecondary SDPLs, a weighted formula including consortia size, performance trends, and a portion tied to the state SDPL increase was utilized. These SDPLs for GY6 (2026) will be used unless the average actual performance of the two most recent years is greater, in which case GY6 (2026) SDPLs will be minimally increased to exceed the average.
For more information on actual performance during Grant Years 1–4 (2021–2024), and for final Grant Year 5 (2025) SDPLs, please review your consortia’s annual performance report.
Table 1 (Secondary)
| Core Indicator | Actual Performance Grant Year 3 (2023) | Actual Performance Grant Year 4 (2024) | Average Performance Grant Year 3–4 (2023–2024) | Grant Year 6 (2026) State Determined Performance Levels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1S1: Graduation Rates (4-year) | 92.63% | 92.24% | 92.44% | 92.45% |
| 2S1: Academic Proficiency: Reading/Language Arts | 45.98% | 42.71% | 44.35% | 44.36% |
| 2S2: Academic Proficiency: Mathematics | 24.28% | 26.35% | 25.32% | 26.35% |
| 2S3: Academic Proficiency: Science | 39.38% | 37.78% | 38.58% | 38.59% |
| 3S1: Post-Program Placement | 51.57% | 59.90% | 55.74% | 55.75% |
| 4S1: Nontraditional Program Concentration | 20.50% | 23.29% | 21.90% | 23.29% |
| 5S3: Program Quality: Work-Based Learning | 5.85% | 11.14% | 8.50% | 11.14% |
Table 2 (Postsecondary)
| Core Indicator | Actual Performance Grant Year 3 (2023) | Actual Performance Grant Year 4 (2024) | Average Performance Grant Year 3–4 (2023–2024) | Grant Year 6 (2026) State Determined Performance Levels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1P1: Postsecondary Retention and Placement | 95.92% | 96.01% | 95.96% | 95.98% |
| 2P1: Earned Recognized Postsecondary Credential | 66.51% | 67.04% | 66.78% | 67.56% |
| 3P1: Nontraditional Program Enrollment | 11.50% | 11.42% | 11.46% | 11.48% |
Additional Information
This page provides proposed SDPLs for Grant Year 6 (2026) and includes actual and average performance for the most recently completed program years used for baselining (Grant Years 3–4, 2023–2024).
Performance Report Updates
- Updated March 24, 2025.
- GY6 SDPLs will be considered final upon approval of the annual revision to the state plan by OCTAE.
Back to top
FY26 Perkins Local Application & CLNA
Consortium: Dakota County Consortium
Consortium application summary
Summary details for the FY26 Perkins local application and CLNA.| Fiscal Year | FY26 |
|---|---|
| Local Application Due | 3/3/25 |
| Consortium Lead | District #917 |
| Secondary Members | District #191 |
| Postsecondary Members | District #917 |
Consortium membership
Member institutions listed in the Dakota County Consortium membership section.| Member institution |
|---|
| Independent School District 191 Burnsville-Eagan-Savage |
| Independent School District 917 Dakota County Technical College |
Programs of Study (POS)
The table below lists Programs of Study and whether they are identified as High Wage, High Skill, and In Demand, along with prior year concentrator counts.
| Program of Study (POS) | Type | High Wage (Y/N) | High Skill (Y/N) | In Demand (Y/N) | Prior Year Secondary Concentrators | Prior Year Postsecondary Concentrators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Resource Systems | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
| Engineering & Technology | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 1 |
| Construction | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
| Manufacturing | Both | Y | Y | Y | 457 | 19 |
| Transportation, Distribution & Logistics | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
| Finance | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
| Hospitality & Tourism | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
| Human Services | Both | Y | Y | Y | 9 | 1 |
| Health Science Technology | Both | Y | Y | Y | 12 | 194 |
| Administrative Support | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 1 |
| General Management | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 41 |
| Manufacturing, Production, Process Development | Both | Y | Y | Y | 457 | 19 |
| Health & Medical Sciences | Both | Y | Y | Y | 21 | 196 |
| Teaching/Training | S-R | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
| Law Enforcement Services | Both | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 |
Narrative 1: Comprehensive Local Needs Assessment (CLNA)
Submit a completed Comprehensive Local Needs Assessment (CLNA) Results and Priorities document with your application materials.
CLNA Prioritized Needs, Strategies, and Measurable Outcomes
Use the table below to answer questions 1–3. Use one table for each CLNA prioritized need. Copy and paste additional tables if more than two priorities will be addressed.
- Of the consortium’s prioritized needs from the CLNA Results and Priorities, which one(s) will be addressed in relation to Programs of Study?
- What are the strategies to address these needs?
- What are the desired measurable outcomes for this strategy? (You will be reporting on these outcomes in the next APR)
NEED A
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| This Need is in Element(s) |
|
| 1. Prioritized Need Identified in the CLNA | Size - Increase Number of Secondary and Post-Secondary CTE Participants & Concentrators: Due to the declining number of CTE participants at the secondary level (from 4,730 in 2021 to 4,698 in 2024) and only 53% of participants becoming concentrators (2,512 in 2024), we see a need to increase the number of CTE participants and concentrators across our districts by strengthening the scope and sequence of our courses within programs of study, introducing the concept of CTE and available secondary and post-secondary programs to students at the middle school level, and strengthening our coordination and communications within districts about how CTE fits into students’ academic programs and career opportunities. |
| 2. Strategies to address need |
|
| 3. Measurable Outcomes |
(Not shown in the extracted text for NEED A on this page segment.) |
NEED B
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| This Need is in Element(s) |
|
| 1. Prioritized Need Identified in the CLNA | Increase Number of Entry and Exit Points for Students Within Programs of Study: As our Consortium implements newly approved programs at the secondary level, we see a need to provide increased career exploration opportunities in middle school and early high school so students can enter secondary CTE programs with diverse postsecondary and/or career pathway options. |
| 2. Strategies to address need |
|
| 3. Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
NEED C
(Next page continues NEED C: “Increase Access to Industry Standard Equipment…”)
NEED C
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| This Need is in Element(s) |
|
| 1. Prioritized Need Identified in the CLNA | Increase Access to Industry-Standard Equipment, Materials, and Experiences: To ensure students are prepared for postsecondary education and careers, the Consortium identified a need to expand access to current industry-standard equipment, materials, and hands-on learning experiences across Programs of Study. |
| 2. Strategies to address need |
|
| 3. Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Secondary Narrative Funding — Secondary
This table lists the budget line items and narrative descriptions for the Secondary portion of the FY2026 Perkins application.
| UFARS Code | Object Code | Narrative Description of Expenditure | Amount | Budget Amounts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | PERSONNEL (EXCERPT) | $65,000.00 | |||
| 110 | 01 | Salary for Secondary Coordinator (0.10 FTE). The Coordinator supports CTE programming, provides technical assistance, and collaborates with district and consortia staff on Perkins implementation. |
$8,450.00 | ||
| 110 | 01 | Stipends for CTE educators to develop/align curriculum, assessments, and program materials connected to programs of study and local improvement needs. | $8,000.00 | ||
| 110 | 01 | CTE related salary expenses supporting local program improvement and implementation of CTE programs and programs of study. | $48,550.00 | ||
| 140 | PURCHASED SERVICES | $1,000.00 | |||
| 140 | 05 | Contracted services to support career exploration / career development activities and/or work-based learning coordination. | $1,000.00 | ||
| 145 | TRAVEL | $2,500.00 | |||
| 145 | 02 | Travel for professional development, including conferences/meetings aligned to CTE program improvement and Perkins implementation. | $2,500.00 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | $68,500.00 | ||||
| 210 | FRINGE BENEFITS | $14,614.92 | |||
| 214 | OTHER AID | $2,000.00 | |||
| 218 | OTHER BENEFITS | $3,180.00 | |||
| 2025–2026 Proposed Budget | $85,114.92 | $85,114.92 |
Use of Funds Supported by Budgeted Amounts
This table indicates which Section 135 Perkins V use(s) of funds are supported by each narrative column, using “Yes” where the PDF shows an “X”.
| Use of Funds (Section 135) | Narrative 1 | Narrative 2 | Narrative 3 | Narrative 4 | Narrative 5 | Narrative 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provide career exploration and career development activities through an organized, systematic framework designed to aid students, including in the middle grades, before enrolling and while participating in a CTE program, in making informed plans and decisions about future education and career opportunities. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Provide professional development for teachers, faculty, school leaders, administrators, specialized instructional support personnel, career guidance and academic counselors, or paraprofessionals. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Provide within CTE the skills necessary to pursue careers in high-skill, high-wage, or in-demand industry sectors or occupations. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Support integration of academic skills into CTE programs and programs of study. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Plan and carry out elements that support the implementation of CTE programs and programs of study that result in increasing student achievement on performance indicators. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Develop and implement evaluations of the activities carried out with funds under this part, including evaluations necessary to complete the local needs assessment and the local APR report. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Programs of Study (POS): CLNA Prioritized Needs
Need A
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Prioritized Need | Secondary and postsecondary Programs of Study require updated program equipment and learning opportunities to ensure student access to high-quality, relevant CTE coursework. |
| Element(s) Addressed | Not specified in the PDF (no elements indicated). |
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Need B
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Prioritized Need | Secondary and postsecondary students require increased work-based learning opportunities to support effective, career-connected Programs of Study. |
| Element(s) Addressed | Not specified in the PDF (no elements indicated). |
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Career Exploration and Student Access
The Consortium will ensure students have equitable access to career exploration activities and Programs of Study that align with regional workforce needs. These activities will support informed decision-making related to career pathways and postsecondary opportunities.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Collaboration with Workforce Development and Regional Partners
The Consortium will collaborate with regional workforce partners, employers, and community organizations to ensure Programs of Study align with local labor market needs and provide students with relevant, career-connected learning experiences.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Support for Special Populations
The Consortium will ensure that members of special populations have equal access to high-quality Career and Technical Education Programs of Study and the support services needed to succeed. Strategies will focus on reducing barriers to participation, completion, and transition to postsecondary education or employment.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Professional Development for CTE Staff
The Consortium will provide ongoing professional development opportunities to support continuous improvement of CTE instruction, program quality, and alignment with industry standards. Professional development will address instructional practices, program alignment, equity of access, and implementation of Perkins V requirements.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Evaluation and Continuous Improvement
The Consortium will evaluate the effectiveness of Perkins-funded activities on an ongoing basis to ensure continuous improvement of Programs of Study and student outcomes. Evaluation efforts will include review of performance data, stakeholder feedback, and implementation progress toward CLNA priorities.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Postsecondary Narrative Funding — Postsecondary
This table lists the budget line items and narrative descriptions for the Postsecondary portion of the FY2026 Perkins application.
| UFARS Code | Object Code | Narrative Description of Expenditure | Amount | Budget Amounts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | PERSONNEL | $54,000.00 | |||
| 110 | 01 | Salary support for postsecondary CTE coordination, program development, and Perkins implementation activities. | $54,000.00 | ||
| 140 | PURCHASED SERVICES | $1,500.00 | |||
| 140 | 05 | Contracted services to support student engagement, career exploration, and program alignment activities. | $1,500.00 | ||
| 145 | TRAVEL | $2,000.00 | |||
| 145 | 02 | Travel for professional development related to postsecondary CTE instruction and Perkins implementation. | $2,000.00 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | $57,500.00 | ||||
| 210 | FRINGE BENEFITS | $12,210.00 | |||
| 2025–2026 Proposed Postsecondary Budget | $69,710.00 | $69,710.00 |
Evaluation and Continuous Improvement
The Consortium will evaluate the effectiveness of Perkins-funded activities on an ongoing basis to ensure continuous improvement of Programs of Study and student outcomes. Evaluation efforts will include review of performance data, stakeholder feedback, and implementation progress toward CLNA priorities.
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Strategies |
|
| Measurable Outcomes (report results in next APR) |
|
Postsecondary Narrative Funding — Postsecondary
This table lists the budget line items and narrative descriptions for the Postsecondary portion of the FY2026 Perkins application.
| UFARS Code | Object Code | Narrative Description of Expenditure | Amount | Budget Amounts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | PERSONNEL | $54,000.00 | |||
| 110 | 01 | Salary support for postsecondary CTE coordination, program development, and Perkins implementation activities. | $54,000.00 | ||
| 140 | PURCHASED SERVICES | $1,500.00 | |||
| 140 | 05 | Contracted services to support student engagement, career exploration, and program alignment activities. | $1,500.00 | ||
| 145 | TRAVEL | $2,000.00 | |||
| 145 | 02 | Travel for professional development related to postsecondary CTE instruction and Perkins implementation. | $2,000.00 | ||
| SUBTOTAL | $57,500.00 | ||||
| 210 | FRINGE BENEFITS | $12,210.00 | |||
| 2025–2026 Proposed Postsecondary Budget | $69,710.00 | $69,710.00 |
Question 1
Need A: Rural/remote learners accessing CTE programming
| CLNA Element(s) addressed | Narrative |
|---|---|
(not indicated in PDF which boxes were selected) |
In its role as a secondary special education intermediate district, the SSC provides CTE learning opportunities for special populations in multiple districts, but it also provides additional services and programming for rural and remote learners in Minnesota. All of the districts in its consortium are in the southeast Metro region, except for its service to a charter school in the far northwest Minnesota community of Karlstad, approximately 340 miles away from the Dakota County area. The SSC has a contract with the Karlstad charter school to provide an online teacher for special education services and an online teacher for its Career and Technical Education offerings, which includes offering the Global Logistics program. As noted above, it is in the process of engaging additional school districts in the far northwest of the state to potentially join its consortium. This will improve support for special populations in remote areas while also maintaining the secondary CTE program and career pathways available for students in these remote districts. |
Need B: Address gap in access to programs/courses based on race and disabilities
| CLNA Element(s) addressed | Narrative |
|---|---|
(not indicated in PDF which boxes were selected) |
As a special education intermediate district, the SSC’s primary role is to ensure that special populations have access to important learning opportunities, including CTE offerings. Its role includes ensuring that special populations can access CTE programming at all of its consortium’s member school districts. Its service includes ensuring that school districts share their CTE programming and courses with the SSC so that it can promote this information to its teachers and staff, including those who are supporting special populations. This includes ensuring that courses are accessible and that they are also safe and welcoming for all students, regardless of race and disability. Where possible, it also ensures that CTE equipment is readily accessible for students with disabilities. The SSC is continuing to support consortium districts in increasing access for special populations. |
Need C: Increase awareness of CTE programming, including increased awareness among students with IEPs and their families
| CLNA Element(s) addressed | Narrative |
|---|---|
(not indicated in PDF which boxes were selected) |
In multiple districts, there is a need to increase awareness and promotion of CTE opportunities, including among students with IEPs and their families. In some cases, this includes developing better outreach/marketing tools and strategies, such as course registration videos that promote CTE opportunities. In 2025-26, as part of their consortium district goals, ISD 200 is planning to incorporate increased discussions with students and families about secondary and postsecondary CTE opportunities, especially now that the high schools have newly-approved programs and DCTC and IHCC are expected to fully merge by summer 2027. Prior to registration, ISD 200 will have all students visit CTE classrooms and watch promotional videos they have created that describe their CTE classes and course activities. SSD 6 has added a student led course fair that emphasizes CTE and elective courses. Every other year, ISD 197 holds a college and career fair for 7th and 8th graders, and, every year, they will have 8th (Text continues on the next page.) |
Question 2
How does the consortium plan to use Perkins funds to address these needs and improve performance?
| Narrative |
|---|
|
The SSC and its member districts plan to use Perkins funds to improve access and support for special populations while also improving overall CTE performance and outcomes. This includes supporting needs for special populations, including ensuring that CTE equipment and courses are accessible and engaging for students with disabilities and students with IEPs. Funding will be used to support district staff in improving awareness and promotion for CTE opportunities and pathways. This includes developing and enhancing marketing/outreach materials that promote CTE pathways, including for special populations and students with IEPs. This may include purchasing and/or developing marketing/outreach tools, such as videos, brochures, and other promotional materials that describe CTE programming. Funding will also support professional development and training for district staff and teachers in ensuring that CTE programming is accessible and welcoming for all students. This includes training in how to incorporate universal design for learning strategies and inclusive teaching practices. Funding will support the consortium’s efforts to engage rural/remote districts in northwest Minnesota and improve CTE programming access for special populations in these areas. This includes supporting online CTE programming and teacher services for the Karlstad charter school and potential additional districts. (Text continues on the next page.) |
Question 1
Need A: Rural/remote learners accessing CTE programming
| CLNA Element(s) addressed | Narrative |
|---|---|
(not indicated in PDF which boxes were selected) |
In its role as a secondary special education intermediate district, the SSC provides CTE learning opportunities for special populations in multiple districts, but it also provides additional services and programming for rural and remote learners in Minnesota. All of the districts in its consortium are in the southeast Metro region, except for its service to a charter school in the far northwest Minnesota community of Karlstad, approximately 340 miles away from the Dakota County area. The SSC has a contract with the Karlstad charter school to provide an online teacher for special education services and an online teacher for its Career and Technical Education offerings, which includes offering the Global Logistics program. As noted above, it is in the process of engaging additional school districts in the far northwest of the state to potentially join its consortium. This will improve support for special populations in remote areas while also maintaining the secondary CTE program and career pathways available for students in these remote districts. |
Need B: Address gap in access to programs/courses based on race and disabilities
| CLNA Element(s) addressed | Narrative |
|---|---|
(not indicated in PDF which boxes were selected) |
As a special education intermediate district, the SSC’s primary role is to ensure that special populations have access to important learning opportunities, including CTE offerings. Its role includes ensuring that special populations can access CTE programming at all of its consortium’s member school districts. Its service includes ensuring that school districts share their CTE programming and courses with the SSC so that it can promote this information to its teachers and staff, including those who are supporting special populations. This includes ensuring that courses are accessible and that they are also safe and welcoming for all students, regardless of race and disability. Where possible, it also ensures that CTE equipment is readily accessible for students with disabilities. The SSC is continuing to support consortium districts in increasing access for special populations. |
Need C: Increase awareness of CTE programming, including increased awareness among students with IEPs and their families
| CLNA Element(s) addressed | Narrative |
|---|---|
(not indicated in PDF which boxes were selected) |
In multiple districts, there is a need to increase awareness and promotion of CTE opportunities, including among students with IEPs and their families. In some cases, this includes developing better outreach/marketing tools and strategies, such as course registration videos that promote CTE opportunities. In 2025-26, as part of their consortium district goals, ISD 200 is planning to incorporate increased discussions with students and families about secondary and postsecondary CTE opportunities, especially now that the high schools have newly-approved programs and DCTC and IHCC are expected to fully merge by summer 2027. Prior to registration, ISD 200 will have all students visit CTE classrooms and watch promotional videos they have created that describe their CTE classes and course activities. SSD 6 has added a student led course fair that emphasizes CTE and elective courses. Every other year, ISD 197 holds a college and career fair for 7th and 8th graders, and, every year, they will have 8th (Text continues on the next page.) |
Question 2
How does the consortium plan to use Perkins funds to address these needs and improve performance?
| Narrative |
|---|
|
The SSC and its member districts plan to use Perkins funds to improve access and support for special populations while also improving overall CTE performance and outcomes. This includes supporting needs for special populations, including ensuring that CTE equipment and courses are accessible and engaging for students with disabilities and students with IEPs. Funding will be used to support district staff in improving awareness and promotion for CTE opportunities and pathways. This includes developing and enhancing marketing/outreach materials that promote CTE pathways, including for special populations and students with IEPs. This may include purchasing and/or developing marketing/outreach tools, such as videos, brochures, and other promotional materials that describe CTE programming. Funding will also support professional development and training for district staff and teachers in ensuring that CTE programming is accessible and welcoming for all students. This includes training in how to incorporate universal design for learning strategies and inclusive teaching practices. Funding will support the consortium’s efforts to engage rural/remote districts in northwest Minnesota and improve CTE programming access for special populations in these areas. This includes supporting online CTE programming and teacher services for the Karlstad charter school and potential additional districts. (Text continues on the next page.) |
Question 2 (continued)
| Narrative |
|---|
|
Perkins funds will also be used to strengthen collaboration between consortium members, including secondary districts and postsecondary partners, to better align Programs of Study and improve transitions for students. This includes coordinated planning between secondary and postsecondary instructors, sharing of curriculum resources, and identification of clear entry and exit points within Programs of Study. Consortium leadership will continue to review performance data, CLNA findings, and stakeholder feedback to inform funding decisions and program improvements. These efforts are intended to improve student access, increase participation and concentrator rates, and support successful transitions to postsecondary education and employment. |
Implementation Summary
The Consortium will implement the strategies described above through coordinated planning, targeted investments, and ongoing evaluation. Activities will focus on improving access to high-quality CTE programs, strengthening career exploration, supporting special populations, and aligning Programs of Study with workforce needs.
| Area of Focus | Planned Activities | Expected Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Program Access | Outreach to students and families, improved scheduling, and expanded online and in-person CTE offerings. | Increased participation in CTE Programs of Study. |
| Special Populations | Targeted supports, accessible equipment, and collaboration with student services staff. | Reduced participation and performance gaps for special populations. |
| Career Exploration | Industry visits, guest speakers, career fairs, and classroom-based career awareness activities. | Increased student awareness of career pathways and postsecondary options. |
| Program Quality | Professional development, curriculum alignment, and purchase of industry-standard equipment. | Improved instructional quality and alignment with workforce needs. |
| Evaluation | Review of performance data, CLNA results, and stakeholder feedback. | Continuous improvement of Programs of Study and Perkins-funded activities. |
Assurances and Certifications
By submitting this application, the Consortium certifies that it will comply with all applicable requirements of the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (Perkins V), related federal regulations, and Minnesota State policies and procedures.
General Assurances
- The Consortium will use Perkins funds only for allowable purposes and in accordance with the approved local application.
- The Consortium will provide equitable access to CTE Programs of Study for all students, including special populations.
- The Consortium will comply with all applicable civil rights laws and regulations.
- The Consortium will maintain appropriate fiscal controls and documentation.
- The Consortium will participate in required monitoring and reporting activities.
- The Consortium will implement Programs of Study aligned with state-approved frameworks.
Data Reporting and Accountability
- The Consortium agrees to submit accurate and timely data for accountability reporting.
- The Consortium will review performance indicators annually and address identified gaps.
- The Consortium will participate in the Comprehensive Local Needs Assessment (CLNA) process.
Program Improvement
- The Consortium will use CLNA results to guide program planning and funding decisions.
- The Consortium will implement improvement strategies to address performance gaps.
- The Consortium will engage stakeholders, including employers and community partners, in program review.
Authorized Signatures
| Role | Name | Title | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consortium Lead | ||||
| Secondary Representative | ||||
| Postsecondary Representative |
Submission
Submit the completed Perkins V Local Application according to Minnesota State Perkins guidance and timelines.
- Keep a copy of the final submitted application for your local records.
- Maintain documentation supporting budgets, planned expenditures, and CLNA-informed decisions.
- Be prepared to provide additional information if requested during review or monitoring.
Questions
For questions about Perkins V accountability, reporting, or the local application, contact:
- Email: CTE@minnstate.edu
- Accountability resources: Accountability Resources